the NAP is vague and subjective

The non aggression principle has been the subject of many debates in libertarian circles . On whether it’s valid and what it applies to. The problem  with the non aggression principle is that it can be applied to anything. Which makes it easy for the social justice left to come in and subvert the libertarian movement. There are different kinds of aggression that don’t have anything to do with self defense or property. Some infiltrator could come into the movement and start claiming that “fat shaming” is a violation of the NAP. Revising the NAP would make a lot of sense in my opinion . It should only apply to person and property. The NAP as it stands right now is completely worthless . It’s still a good concept but i feel it opens the movement up to leftist subversion .

Check out my About / How to find me pages. If you’d like to follow me.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s